A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z.

To return to front page, click here.


See Frank Andrews, FTR 2, 2002. The International Correspondence Schools. Originating in the U.S. in 1891, the obvious application of sound recording to Language teaching resulted in sets of phonograph cylinders accompanying text books by 1903. By 1909 the ICS was active in this country, still with cylinders. Inevitably – Frank is not certain when – disc records were introduced. Whether they were recorded and pressed here is uncertain, but they were certainly made in France, and those must surely have been imported – and sold – here, thus qualifying them for inclusion here. But whether they date to before 1914 or after 1918, we do not as yet know.

IDEAL – 1.

See Frank Andrews, FTR 2, 2002. An extremely mysterious label, known to Frank only by the incomplete part of one disc. It has a red label with black printing, with a crown and a griffin rampant holding a disc. It bears the legend: ‘Ebnoloid… for smoothness, Strength and Flexibility’. Alas, the part of the label where the titling would appear is missing. The disc was made by the ‘laminated’ process. It is assigned by Frank to before 1920. Nothing else is known… but, an Ideal record with catalogue number 1005 was recently offered in an auction. It had 2 sides by the Scottish baritone Tom Kinniburgh, and was reputed to be sourced from masters used by Diploma/Stella/Victory. Those were all labels belonging to J Blum & Co., London, and were mostly made for him in Germany by Kalliope, circa 1911-1914. Might this be the same ‘Ideal’ label as the mystery one above?

 IDEAL – 2.

See Frank Andrews, FTR 2, 2002. Only slightly less intriguing than the above, is another extremely rare record. This time, however, Frank informs us that the name ‘Ideal’ was a trade mark (though not registered) of the Sound Recording Co. Ltd. The SRC were in the habit of thinking up a name for a record, and (usually) registering it. They did this a number of times. They could then offer the name to a client who wanted their own make of records, to be produced for them, naturally, by the SRC. Or indeed, use it themselves, as in the case of their Popular discs. Frank only knows of three examples of this SRC Ideal record, but the name of the client for whom they were produced is a mystery. The Popular masters on the three date from mid to late 1920. They would have been pressed, as usual, by Crystalate at their factory in, or near, Tonbridge, Kent.


See Frank Andrews: FTR 4, 2002/3, p201. The scarce –but gorgeously labeled – Ilco records were produced in Germany for I Lange & Co. of Berlin. Who distributed them here is unknown. They used masters also to be found on Aga, Bel Canto and Dacapo. In the case of sides as on Bel Canto – such as the ones on 5215 above – the catalogue and master numbers are both in a 5000 series. The Lange company was reported as in liquidation in April 1912, so this was a very transient label indeed, as was the equally sumptuously labeled Bel Canto. Probably just a few months in late 1911 or early 1912. February 2013: We are grateful to Dr. Rainer Lotz for reminding us that this label is actually ILCO and not JLCO – the ornamental letter ‘I’ having apparently tripped up Frank Andrews, which takes some doing! In fact, the letter ‘J’ (along with Q, X and Y) are extremely scarce in German – so an ornamental foot to the letter ‘I’ is perfectly in order. An ‘I’ with a similar foot occurs on the German Invicta label; but this would not mislead an English speaker – at least, we hope not!


See TMR 90, 91, 1995. In TMR 90, John Booth, the editor, reproduced an IMP label in monochrome, and asked for any further information. The label colour was not stated. In TMR 91, Frank Andrews replied that these were produced by ‘Edison Bell’ from Bell Disc and possibly Winner masters. The proprietor is unknown. Curiously, Frank reveals that no less than four of these IMP records have been found in the U.S.A. As they are practically unknown in the U.K., one is forced to conjecture whether they were made here for export to the U.S.A? This seems to us rather unlikely, as the USA generally had high import tariffs. Some of the sides date from 1908; but the IMP in TMR 90 (as also the one here) has a copyright stamp; these came in in 1912. Still, the presence of a copyright stamp at this early period is not, we think, proof that the disc was definitely sold in the U.K. There are instances (also involving ‘Edison Bell’ as it happens) of Minstrel and Herald records made for J E Pidgeon in New Zealand, which have been seen with U.K. stamps. Perhaps in those early days it did not matter whether the royalty was paid in the country of manufacture or the country of consumption? Anyway, IMP records, needless to say, are very scarce indeed. Perhaps the rather sinister appearance of its eponymous being is to blame?


The C.L.P.G.S. recently published No.33 in their Reference Series. This contains 36 pages of the history of the various Imperial labels, from 1907 to early 1937. It also contains a CD-ROM, which has a searchable list of the several thousand discs that appeared on these. Go to www.clpgs.org.uk/reference-series.htm to get your copy! Also see Frank Andrews: FTR 2, 2002, pp73-5. Frank’s comprehensive write-up  was revised & is included in the above Reference Series booklet. These first Imperials were made by the U.S. firm Leeds & Catlin of New York, and imported to the U.K. beginning about April 1906. They were single sided. 600 issues were available by January 1907. The small (~1.5″) ‘back-sticker’ is present only on some (early?) examples. This is probably because the sticker stipulates that the discs may only be used on a machine with a feed-screw – like a cylinder phonograph. This was part of a dodge to avoid infringing a U.S. patent. Surprising as it may seems to us, the fact that the sound-box playing a disc was carried across the disc by the very groove which it was tracking, was a crucial patent in the U.S. at the time. But as far as I know, it was totally irrelevant in the U.K., so eventually, no back-stickers? Imperial had some recordings, of exalted status, made for them in Europe, by Favorite. By way of contrast, in 1907 the famous Scottish baritone Ian Colquhoun went to the U.S. and recorded over 30 sides, presumably mainly for the British market. However, in 1909, after long-ongoing patent litigation, Leeds & Catlin were compelled to stop manufacturing discs. The residual stock was sold off cheaply; in this country, largely by Gamages. Single sided Imperials are quite scarce. Some of the Favorite sides were issued in the U.K. at higher prices. They had a different, black label featuring just the crown, and are excessively rare. In 1911 the trade mark was acquired by the Sound Recording Company – see below. N.B. Frank originally wrote up Imperial in TMR 69 & 70, 1984-85. Those articles are still worthy of study.


The C.L.P.G.S. recently published No.33 in their Reference Series. This contains 36 pages of the history of the various Imperial labels, from 1907 to early 1937. It also contains a CD-ROM, which has a searchable list of the several thousand discs that appeared on these. Go to www.clpgs.org.uk/reference-series.htm to get your copy! Also see Frank Andrews: HD 135, 1983; TMR 16,  June 1972, p 209. Many years ago, even before Frank Andrews began his research, we 78 enthusiasts used to be puzzled by the evident visual connection between Imperial – 1 above, and Imperial – 3 below. How did the noble, coloured label of U.S. single sided Imperials re-surface around 15 years later, as a budget disc with a simple two colour label? In the end, the answer was simple: Frank discovered that the Sound Recording Co. had bought the trade mark in 1911 – but seemed not to have used it until late 1922. But on p 293 of HD 135, Frank records that the SRC offered double-sided Imperial records in August 1913. On p 209 of TMR 16 there is a black & white image of the label. The label is reproduced above from an advert. in the Talking Machine News, kindly supplied by Joe Moore, dating from autumn 1913. But since practically nobody has ever seen one of these ‘missing links’, the launch cannot have been successful. We don’t even know what colour the label was! Perhaps they advertised them, and, receiving hardly any orders, threw in the towel?  So this Imperial – 2 is very, very rare indeed, even if there were supposed to be at least 61 of them. However, Bill Dean-Myatt recently pointed out that the advert states: “For wholesale buyers only – ‘Territory Reserved’” This might imply an overseas ‘territory’, so the discs – if they were made at all – might have gone for export? (The same advert also offered ‘Stavophone’ Records on the same terms; it would seem that none of those have been seen either.)


The C.L.P.G.S. recently published No.33 in their Reference Series. This contains 36 pages of the history of the various Imperial labels, from 1907 to early 1937. It also contains a CD-ROM, which has a searchable list of the several thousand discs that appeared on these. Go to www.clpgs.org.uk/reference-series.htm to get your copy! Also see Frank Andrews on Crystalate: HD 134, 135, 136, 1983. This series of articles concerns a company of vital importance to the British record industry. It always claimed to be the oldest maker of disc records in this country. It is impossible to make a short abstract of what Frank says; you really should try to get back numbers of HD. Suffice it to say that the company existed from 1901 and soon made itself indispensable by its contract pressings, beginning with Nicole in 1903 (though in this case they probably only supplied the materials). You will see on these web pages, many, many labels that were pressed by Crystalate, who had factories in and around Tonbridge in Kent. Still, it was not until late 1922 that they had their own label, seen here. The name Imperial came indirectly from the U.S. disc of that name, via the Sound Recording Co., which was eventually taken over or absorbed by Crystalate in about 1922. They already had large quantities of masters on their shelves, including those for the SRC’s Grammavox label, as well as Popular and Bull Dog records. Apparently, catalogue numbers from 999 downwards were assigned to these earlier sides, and that 1,000 and above were assigned to new recordings, plus futher delvings back into their ‘shelf stock’. E.g., Imperial 1068 above is derived from 1913 Grammavox masters. (‘David Bell’ is in fact the well-known Welsh singer David Brazell.) Imperial 820 is well towards the bottom of the range of catalogue numbers; it bears 2 marches that were originally issued on Grammavox in June 1912. Certain 1916 sides by banjoist J.J. Ashton (from Bull Dog) were issued on Imperial and remained in catalogue until Imperial ceased in 1933, to be replaced by Rex, but that is far beyond our time period. The Imperial label was very successful (if always ‘cheap & cheerful’); they are common to this day. However, the red and black ‘Imperial De Luxe’ discs are very scarce, and the series must have been abandoned early on.


The C.L.P.G.S. recently published No.33 in their Reference Series. This contains 36 pages of the history of the various Imperial labels, from 1907 to early 1937. It also contains a CD-ROM, which has a searchable list of the several thousand discs that appeared on these, including Imperial Junior. Go to www.clpgs.org.uk/reference-series.htm to get your copy! Besides the enormous catalogue of 10″ (25cm) Imperial discs, Crystalate also made a mini-disc version of their label, at 7″ (17.75cm). However, these were intended for export to other countries, and as far as we know, this size was not sold in the U.K. They were certainly sold in Australia, but the label above must have been intended for sale in The Netherlands (or possibly South Africa?). Thanks to Mike Thomas, we know that this disc was recorded in 1928, and so was most likely recorded electrically, but include it here in case there are other, earlier issues that might have been made by the old mechanical process. After all, it’s our website, and I can jolly well put up all sorts of things on it, even if they’re wrong, can’t I?  8^)


For all its grand name, the exceedingly rare product of this company is disappointingly modest and unassuming in appearance. It has the unfortunate appearance of being overstuck on another make, but it is a genuine pressed-in label. It was manufactured for the IGRC by Homophone, so is a quality product after all. The only real problem was that nobody seemed to buy any of them! Ca. 1910-1914.


See Frank Andrews, FTR 3, 2002. A mysterious label, which might not have existed; but Frank includes such marques – one never knows! The International Talking Machine Society Ltd. was based in Milan, Italy. Its sole agent in this country was one M. St. Dyktor of Gray’s Inn Road, London WC. In November 1911 it was announced that records were being made in the 12″ (30cm) size, and British repertoire was to be included. There followed a long and profound silence, which continues to this day, broken only in 2002 by the information which Frank gave us in FTR 3. Did any ever appear?

INVICTA – later Guardsman.

A relatively complete listing of Invicta and Guardsman records was privately published in 2010. (The Invicta label was re-named Guardsman in early 1914). It was compiled by this writer, principally from data supplied by the late Arthur Badrock and by Frank Andrews, but also by many other contributors. Only 30 copies were printed, and to our surprise, these were quickly taken up. Eventually a second edition with additions and corrections will appear. For more info. on the book and some corrections to the listing, click: guardsman.htm

Invicta appeared in November 1912. Its original proprietor,  William Barraud, was the brother of Francis Barraud, the painter of ‘His Master’s Voice’ fame. William had already been the British agent for Dacapo records, and when Dacapo opened their own direct branch in London, he looked for another line. He took on Invicta records, which were made in Germany by Berolina. Unfortunately, after only a few months, a disagreement arose, and Berolina appointed another agent, John Abrahams. Abrahams continued to sell the red white & blue German Invictas right up until August 1914, when supplies obviously ceased, at around catalogue number 380. The split occurred in mid-1913, at Cat. No. 270.  Barraud believed that he had the rights to the name Invicta, and so got Invicta records pressed here. These are the ones with the blue labels. At first he went back through his original catalogue, trying to get the same artistes to record the same selections. It is important to realise then, that blue Invicta 206 above, though it carries the same titles by the same artist (Billy Whitlock) as are found on red white & blue Invicta 206, they are different recordings made many months later. These remakes all have master numbers between about 14370 and 14639.  Besides this, Barraud needed new recordings. These were made in a new 100 master series. The trouble was, that he carried on with the catalogue number 271. Thus, absurdly, there were two different Invicta labels both using the same catalogue numbers – and, of course, carrying completely different artistes and repertoire! This outlandish state of affairs continued for several months, creating a nightmare for future discographers. Briefly, a court found against Barraud regarding the name Invicta, so he changed the name of his label to Guardsman, which began at 340. The red sticker above was attached to his remaining stocks of blue Invictas. See also Guardsman.


Again from Dr. Lotz, is a label manufactured in Germany at the Turmalin works. The famous tune title would indicate a date of say 1911 – 1914. The label design, very characteristic of some Turmalin products, is more often to be found on completely anonymous records – but there was always the option to overstamp, or in this case overprint, a label with any name that a client might desire. As it was recorded in London, this incredibly scarce label must have been intended for sale here, but by whom is unknown. This example is the only one this writer has ever seen!


See Frank Andrews, FTR 3. I.S.I. records were made by the German concern International Schallplatten Industrie, of Leipzig. Their trade mark was registered (in Germany) in February 1910. As you see, their label had I.S.I. quite small, right at the top, and most of the rest of the label is devoted to titling in a number of languages, drawn variously from German, French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch and English. The first label above has a German (AMMRE) copyright stamp: this would be good for sales in any of the four countries indicated by the language. English only labels are also known. These were announced in February 1912, and were pressed from London-made recordings. I assume that they were sold here, though Frank points out that this is unknown, and they might just have been exported to parts of the British Empire. They are extremely rare; but on the grounds that they bore London-recorded material, they merit a place here in any case. Another ISI label was ‘Symphony Concert’.

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z.

British disc records of the 'Acoustic' Era.